Opened 15 years ago
Last modified 11 years ago
#69 closed defect
Inclusive "P b bbar" cross section — at Initial Version
Reported by: | Frank Siegert | Owned by: | support@sherpa-mc.de |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | major | Milestone: | |
Component: | Unknown | Version: | 1.2.1 |
Keywords: | Cc: |
Description
Sherpa's cross section for pp -> P b bar
around the Z->b bbar peak doesn't reproduce the one in Madgraph if the following cuts are applied:
- pT(photon) > 200 GeV
- pT(b) > 50 GeV
- pT(bbar) > 50 GeV
- |eta(photon)| < 2.5
- |eta(b)| < 2.5
- |eta(bbar)| < 2.5
- dR(photon, b) > 0.6
- dR(photon, bbar) > 0.6
- 89<m_{b bbar}<93
Using cteq6l1 and a fixed fac/ren scale=mZ, Madgraph gives 0.007710 pb, while Sherpa gives 0.020742 pb.
If I select the resonant diagrams only, i.e. pp -> P Z[b bbar]
then Sherpa (0.005917 pb) and Madgraph (0.005869 pb) agree well.
I attach four setups:
- Madgraph inclusive (inc_proc_card.dat + run_card.dat)
- Madgraph resonant (cut_proc_card.dat + run_card.dat)
- Sherpa inclusive (Run.inc.dat)
- Sherpa resonant (Run.cut.dat)
I have checked that the generated diagrams are the same. If I haven't overlooked something the above mentioned cuts should be implemented in both setups (and since the resonant XS is consistent, this seems to work).
Change History (5)
Changed 15 years ago by
Attachment: | Run.inc.dat added |
---|
Changed 15 years ago by
Attachment: | Run.cut.dat added |
---|
Changed 15 years ago by
Attachment: | run_card.dat added |
---|
Changed 15 years ago by
Attachment: | inc_proc_card.dat added |
---|
Changed 15 years ago by
Attachment: | cut_proc_card.dat added |
---|
Note: See
TracTickets for help on using
tickets.