Large difference METS vs. STRICT_METS in Zj@LO
|Reported by:||Frank Siegert||Owned by:||firstname.lastname@example.org|
The (loose) METS scale setter gives significantly different integration results in a simple LO Z+j example compared to STRICT_METS. The attached run card will result in xs(Zj,loose)=243pb vs. xs(Zj,strict)=310pb.
This has been the case since 2.0.0, while in 1.4.5 the two agree much better (306pb vs. 310pb).